检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雪花[1] 路畅 Zhang Xuehua;Lu Chang(Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 China. China University Of Political Science And Law,Beijing 102249 China.)
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875 [2]中国政法大学国际法学院,北京102249
出 处:《北京印刷学院学报》2018年第4期145-148,共4页Journal of Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication
摘 要:2012年,我国对《民事诉讼法》和《刑事诉讼法》修订时,分别在两大诉讼领域以诉讼立法的形式确立了"有专门知识的人"制度,学术界主流观点将之解读为专家辅助人制度,该制度的创设为科学时代背景下应对诉讼中面临的科学技术难题开辟了新的路径。然而,从该制度运行五年多的实际效果来看,专家辅助人远未在司法实践中发挥出应有的作用。这其中,除了微观层面的制度设计流于粗疏简陋之外,更为主要的原因是没有站在宏观层面的高度,将专家辅助人制度置于整个诉讼体系中加以考量,构建出有助于实现该制度立法价值的相关保障机制。未来的制度完善中,有必要建立对等告知、否决救济、意见开示和心证公开这四种最基本的保障机制。The expert assessor system was established in both civil litigation and criminal litigation when those codes were revised in2012.The establishment of this system opens up a new way to solve those scientific and technological problems?in litigation under the background of the scientific age.However,according to the practical results of over five years,the expert assessor system doesn't play it's due role in lawsuit activities.The causes of this status quo,besides simple rules at the micro level,are mainly due to lack of relevant safeguard mechanisms at the macro level.It is necessary to establish four mechanisms in the future system consummation,including peer told,vetoing relief,disclosure of evidence and exposition of judgement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28