检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡斌[1] 李忠强[1] 刘婷婷[1] 王瀚宇 HU Bin;LI Zhong-qiang;LIU Ting-ting;WANG Han-yu(North China Sea Branch of State Oceanic Ministration Marine Technical Support Center,Qingdao 266061,China)
机构地区:[1]国家海洋局北海海洋技术保障中心,山东青岛266061
出 处:《海洋科学》2018年第1期6-10,共5页Marine Sciences
基 金:全球变化与海气相互作用专项(GASI-02-PAC-ST-MSwin);山东省海洋生态环境与防灾减灾重点实验室开放基金项目(2012016)~~
摘 要:在现有两种比较主流无损压缩算法基础上(Huffman算法和LZW算法),根据海洋观测浮标采集的观测数据特点,比较两种压缩算法的优缺点,并通过布放在西太平洋海域的一套观测浮标数据进行数据验证。结果表明,使用Huffman算法和LZW算法分别对海洋观测浮标数据进行压缩,两者的压缩率都基本可达50%左右甚至更低,Huffman算法压缩率较优,而LZW算法复杂度较优。通过分析,可证明这两种无损压缩算法都能有效地提高深远海通信效率和降低通信成本,同时也提高了科学观测数据的安全性和保密性,可根据实际情况选择在深远海观测浮标数据通信中应用。In this paper, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of two existing mainstream lossless compression algorithms (Huffman algorithm and LZW algorithm), based on data collected by an ocean observation buoy.For data validation, we use the observation buoy data. The results show that both the Huffman and LZW algorithms compress the ocean observation buoy data, but the compression rate of the original data by the Huffman algorithm reaches 50% or even higher. As such, the Huffman algorithm yields a better compression ratio, whereas the LZW algorithm more effectively describes the complexity. Based on these results, we conclude that both of these lossless compression algorithms can be used to effectively improve communication efficiency in far-reaching seas and reduce communication cost, while also improving the security and confidentiality of scientific observation data.These findings will prove useful in applications of deep-sea observation-buoy-data communication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28