检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑建成[1] 王卓 Zheng Jiancheng1 ,Wang Zhuo2(1.Institute of International Economy, University of International Business Economics, Beijing, 100029; 2. Institute ofInternational Economics, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, 100037)
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济研究院,北京100029 [2]外交学院国际关系研究所,北京100037
出 处:《东北亚经济研究》2018年第2期44-60,共17页Northeast Asia Economic Research
摘 要:自2015年亚投行成立之初,中国曾力邀日本加入,但被明确拒绝。近期随着局势变化,日本对加入"一带一路"倡议表达了善意,但对加入亚投行依然没有太大变化。历史上美日两国围绕ADB和AMF曾展开过一系列博弈,这和今天围绕AIIB中美日三国所展开的博弈既相似又有所不同。中日两国在理念、认知、意愿等方面都存在差异,如何打破僵局,找准突破点,推动日本加入亚投行,在当下阶段更显必要和紧迫。Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank has given initial results since its establishment.China invited Japan at the beginning of establishment in 2015,which ended up with a clear rejection.Japan shows interests for "The Belt and Road" initiative along with the changes of situation,although their attitude to AIIB still stays negative.There have been a series of gambling between Japan and the US about ADB and AMF,which were similar but different from today's gambling among China,Japan and the US about AIIB.There are differences in idea,acknowledge,intention and other aspects between China and Japan,so it is necessary and urgent to fi nd a way to break the ice through the correct breakthrough point,so as to facilitate Japan to join AIIB.
分 类 号:F831.2[经济管理—金融学] D822.331.3[政治法律—政治学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117