票据追索权判决中明确票据再追索权之初探  

A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF CLEARING THE RE-RECOURSE OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT IN THE VERDICT OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT′S RECOURSE

作　　者：赵海盟 ZHAO Hai-meng(Anhui University, Hefei Anhui 230601)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《巢湖学院学报》2018年第2期46-50,共5页Journal of Chaohu University

摘　　要：在票据追索权纠纷案件中,原告向两个以上前手行使追索权,法院在判决中支持原告追索权时,是否可以根据票据被追索权人的请求同时判决支持对其前手的票据再追索权,而不需要票据追索权案件中的被追索人另行起诉,主张该权利。从法的价值角度出发,票据追索权案件判决中明确票据再追索权迎合了法的自由、正义、秩序的基本价值,有利于提高诉讼效率,方便当事人诉讼。票据追索权案件判决中明确票据再追索权具有立法上的可行性,同时对法制的完善具有重要意义。针对当前法学理论上的阻碍,立法上应当对其内涵进行明确界定,同时对撤诉、上诉、答辩期间等配套制度作出规定。On the case of negotiable instrument＇s recourse, the plaintiff exercise the right of recourse from more than two priorparties. It is possible to decide to support the re-recourse of negotiable instrument to its last prior party in accordance with the request of the subsequent party, when the court upholds the plaintiff＇ s recourse in the judgment, without prosecution. Fromthe point of view of the value of law, clearing the rerecourse of negotiable instrument in the verdict of negotiable instrument＇s recourse is in line with the law of freedom, justice, order, enhances the efficiency of litigation, and facilitates litigation. It has legislative feasibility. It could also help improve the legal system. In view of the obstruction of the current legal theory, we should make clear and define the connotation of legislation, and make clear rules for the supporting system such as withdrawal,appeal and defense period.

关 键 词：票据再追索权 法的价值 立法界定 

分 类 号：D912.28[政治法律—民商法学]