检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宏伟[1] 戴欣 徐静[1] WANG Hong-wei,DAI Xin,XU Jing(Burn and plastic surgery department of the 413 Hospital of PLA , Zhejiang Province, 316000,Chin)
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第四一三医院烧伤整形科,浙江舟山316000
出 处:《中国医疗美容》2018年第5期29-32,共4页China Medical Cosmetology
摘 要:目的研究分析对小面积深度烧伤修复中应用整形外科技术的临床价值。方法选取2016年03月~2018年03月我院接受治疗的86例小面积深度烧伤修复患者为本次研究对象,按照抛硬币法随机分组原则,分为研究组和参照组,其中参照组为43例,采用常规修复技术,研究组为43例,予以整形外科技术修复,比较两组临床治疗效果以及治疗后生活质量评分。结果比较分析,研究组总有效率为(95.35%),高于参照组总有效率(81.40%),同时研究组社会功能、躯体功能以及心理功能、情感功能等生活质量评分指标,均要优于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对小面积深度烧伤修复患者实施整形外科技术修复,具有十分显著的治疗效果,值得临床推广应用。Objective To study and analyze the clinical value of plastic surgery in the repair of small deep burn wounds. Methods 86 cases of small area deep burn repair in our hospital from 03 months to 03 months of 2018 were selected as the study object. According to the random grouping principle of coin tossing method, it was divided into study group and reference group. The reference group was 43 cases, the routine repair technique was used, and the study group was 43 cases, and the plastic surgery technique was repaired. The clinical efficacy and quality of life after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the study group was(95.35%), which was higher than that of the reference group(81.40%). At the same time, the social function, body function, psychological function and emotional function of the study group were all better than those of the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Plastic repair for patients with small area deep burn is effective and worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.237.218