检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:底高扬[1]
出 处:《江汉大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第3期22-29,共8页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"香港立法会普选背景下的功能界别制度改造"(13AZZ015)
摘 要:香港立法会辩论具备"辩论导入—辩论运行—辩论导出"的横向结构和包括可辩论性、实效性、正当性等基本范畴在内的多层次规制的纵向结构。理解香港立法会辩论制度不仅要从规则表面形塑其基本制度构造,还要明白其背后的权力配置与制约原理。香港立法会辩论制度的演变符合香港现代民主发展的一般规律,但其具体运作过度依赖立法会主席的自我规制,存在偏离香港立法会独特辩论价值定位的可能性,使该辩论在处理香港与中央、行政与立法、泛民派与建制派利益冲突问题上面临道德风险、政治风险。The debate system of Hong Kong Legislative Council has a horizontal structure of"debate introduction-debate operation-debate eduction"and a vertical structure with multi-level rules including the basic categories of being debatable, valid, and legitimate.To comprehend the debate system in Hong Kong Legislative Council not only needs to figure out its basic structure from the superficial rules simply, but also needs to understand the hidden principles of power allocation and restriction. The evolution of the debate system in the Legislative Council conforms to the general rule of Hong Hong's modern democratic development, but its specific operation relies unduly on the self-regulation of the Legislative Council's president. This may cause the Legislative Council to deviate from the debate's unique values, bringing moral and political risks to the debate when dealing with conflicting interests between Hong Kong and the Central Government, the administration and the legislation, and the Pan-democrats and the pro-Beijing camp.
分 类 号:D921.9[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7