检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李红豆 LI Hong-dou(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Changqing, 401120)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2018年第2期77-83,共7页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基 金:2017年重庆市研究生科研创新项目"刑事辩护有效影响裁判结果的保障机制研究"(CYS17105)
摘 要:以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革要求落实庭审实质化,庭审实质化的落实必然要求关键的证人出庭作证,构建与我国司法实践相适应的出庭证人调查方式是推进庭审实质化的重要内容。以审判为中心与完善出庭证人调查方式具有内在的一致性。我国刑事诉讼法及司法解释关于证人调查方式的规定转为抽象,刑事庭审实质化改革试点法院细化了证人出庭作证的调查方式,有利于准确查明案件事实。目前我国不宜采用英美式的交叉询问方式,为进一步完善对出庭证人的调查方式,可以根据案件繁简程度适用不同的方式,构建更加规范的证人自由陈述与控辩双方询问相结合以及控辩询问为主,职权询问为必要补充的中国式询问规则。The trial-centered reform of criminal litigation requires make criminal trials substantive, key witness attending court is a basic requirement of making criminal trials substantive, so construct a suitable method to interview witnesses is an important part to push forward substantialization of the trial process. Taking trial as the center is inherently in accord with the improvement of interviewing witness methods. The methods of interviewing attended witness are very abstract in Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and its judicial interpretations,some pilot courts have enacted more detailed rules, which in favor of identifying the facts of cases. At present, it is not applicable for our country to adopt American cross-examination rules. We could adopt different methods in different cases and construct more formal rules to improve the method of interviewing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.212.110