检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李英珍 Li Yingzhen
机构地区:[1]海南师范大学图书馆
出 处:《图书馆学研究》2018年第11期89-92,F0003,共5页Research on Library Science
摘 要:近年来,美国、英国与欧盟等国家和地区针对文本与数据挖掘技术对传统版权法的挑战,通过开展司法实践、变革版权例外制度,或者提出立法草案等措施积极应对。图书馆是数据收集、整合与开发利用服务的最重要主体之一,版权例外制度创新为图书馆从事文本与数据挖掘活动奠定了必要的法律基础。我国图书馆对文本与数据挖掘版权例外制度存在着迫切需求,应积极借鉴国际经验,适时立法。图书馆还要加强与权利人的沟通和联系,携手合作解决文本与数据挖掘涉及的版权问题。In recent years,the United States,the United Kingdom,and the European Union have either made an attempt on judicial practice or established the system of copyright exceptions or proposed draft legislation,in response to the challenges of Text and Data Mining(TDM)to traditional copyright system.All these have created important legal conditions for libraries in carrying out TDM activities.The development of Chinas libraries also requires systems on TDM copyright exceptions.It is suggested that China should learn from international experience actively and legislate the system in due course.At the same time,libraries are required to strengthen the communication and liaison with right holders,and collaborate to solve the copyright issues involved in TDM.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31