检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵桂兰[1] 周乾 SHAO Gui-lan;ZHOU Qian(School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)
机构地区:[1]中国海洋大学经济学院
出 处:《稀土》2018年第3期149-158,共10页Chinese Rare Earths
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71273247)
摘 要:以复杂网络理论为基础,结合探索性空间数据分析方法,对中美稀土出口空间格局比较研究。研究表明,中美稀土出口空间格局差异显著,美国稀土出口空间格局的均质性程度高于中国,区位条件是差异形成的主要根源。两国稀土出口空间结构相似性较强,稀土出口的空间格局以互补性为主,战略性贸易政策驱动空间结构由趋同到趋异演变。中国稀土出口的地理集中程度略高于美国,两国的稀土出口格局均呈现出空间分异特征且存在局部区域空间集聚,地理、经济与政治因素交织影响决定了贸易格局的复杂性。Based on complex network theory,combined with exploratory spatial data analysis,we carry out a comparative study on spatial pattern of China's and USA's rare earth export trade. Conclusions are drawn as follows. There are significant differences in spatial pattern of rare earth export between China and USA,and the degree of homogenization of USA's spatial pattern of rare earth export is higher than that of China. Locational condition is the main source of differences. There is strong spatial structure similarity of rare earth export between China and USA,yet the spatial pattern of rare earth export is mainly complementary. In recent years,strategic trade policies have driven spatial structure from convergence to divergence. The rare earth export of China is slightly more geographically concentrated than that of USA,besides,there are spatial differentiation and locally spatial agglomeration in China's and USA's rare earth export,and the influences exerted by geographical and economical and political factors determine the complexity of trade pattern.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222