疑难案件司法裁判的进路——事实属性与行为理性的视角  

On Decisions of Hard Cases: From Perspective of Meanings of Facts and Reason of Behavior

作　　者：潘德勇[1] Pan Deyong

机构地区：[1]湖北经济学院法学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2018年第7期98-106,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目"合同法上的证明责任问题研究"(项目编号:14CFX034)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：疑难案件的出现使裁判陷入形式合理性和实质合理性的两难,造成司法的法律效果与社会效果难以兼顾、案件的实体正义与形式正义只能择一的困境。这种两难和困境是一种假象,源于学界对法条主义和后果导向两种裁判方法在案件的适用情形、分析视角、解释工具的错误认识。在疑难案件裁判中,法条主义方法实质合理性之不足,可借助"原则裁判"来弥补。后果导向裁判方法形式合理性之欠缺,可通过"指导性案例"制度获救济。Hard cases make bad law. The courts are faced with a dilemma of achieving both of the formal justice and substantive justice. This was deeply rooted in the wrong assumption that there were differences between the applicable situations, analyzing perspectives and interpreting methods. The legalism may resort to legal principle for want of substantive justice and the Consequentialism may borrow from the case law to remedy its formal justice.

关 键 词：疑难案件 法条主义 后果导向 指导性案例 

分 类 号：D903[政治法律—法学理论]