刑法第300条邪教犯罪的立法证成和司法认定  

Legislative Argumentation and Judicial Cognizance of Anti-cult Legislation in the Article 300 of the Criminal Law

作　　者：方海涛 FANG Hai-tao(The People＇s Procuratorate of Jiangbei District, Chongqing 400025, Chin)

机构地区：[1]重庆市江北区人民检察院,重庆400025

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2018年第2期35-40,共6页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

摘　　要：不论是基于反邪教立法传统,还是当前邪教治理的客观需要,我国都有制定并保留刑法第300条反邪教法律条文的必要。为了避免出现预防性立法对宗教信仰自由的干预,在司法实践中对犯罪的认定应当遵守主客观相结合原则,准确把握犯罪适用条件,严格区分利用邪教破坏法律实施和单纯的信仰邪教行为,避免将信仰自由犯罪化,规范和保护新兴宗教在我国的健康发展。Whether to follow the anti-cult legislation tradition or meet the realistic needs of cult governance, China has the necessity to formulate anti-cult regulations and retain the Article 300 of the Criminal Law. In order to avoid the intervention of preventive legislation on religious freedom, we should abide by the principle of combining subjective and objective factors in the judicial practice of conviction, accurately understand the applicable conditions of the crime, strictly distinguish the acts of utilizing cult to sabotage the implementation of the state＇s laws and the pure belief in evil religions, so as to avoid criminalizing the freedom of faith, to standardize and protect the healthy development of new religious groups in China.

关 键 词：邪教 破坏法律实施 立法证成 司法认定 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]