检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑猛虎 陈计远 祁忠贤 段恩泽[1] 王红英[1] Zheng Meng-hu;Chen Ji-yuan;Qi Zhong-xian;Duan En-ze;Wang Hong-ying(College of Engineering China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083)
出 处:《中国养兔》2018年第3期14-16,共3页Chinese Journal of Rabbit Farming
基 金:现代农业产业技术体系建设项目-兔产业体系(CARS-43-01A)
摘 要:本文介绍了国内兔养殖舍中几种常见的清粪方式,即传统的人工清粪和不同形式的机械清粪。并对这几种清粪方式的优缺点和使用性能进行对比分析,针对这几种清粪方式的缺点提出了一些解决思路,总结了这几种清粪方式在国内兔养殖舍的发展趋势,为今后国内兔养殖业清粪方式进一步的发展成熟提供了一定的参考。This article describes several commonly used methods of manure removal in domestic rabbit breedinghouses, namely traditional artificial decontamination and mechanical decontamination developed afterwards.The comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages and the performance of these types of manure re-moval methods are proposed, and some solutions are proposed for the disadvantages of these manure removalmethods. The development trends of these manure removal methods in domestic rabbit breeding houses are sum-marized. This will provide a certain reference for the further development and maturation of the domestic animalhusbandry industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3