公司法人格否认制度“入典”的正当性质疑——兼评《民法总则》“法人章”的立法技术  

The judicial personality denies the legitimacy of the system: The legislation of “general principles of civil law” and “legal person seal”

作　　者：薛波 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2018年第4期114-125,共12页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部青年基金项目(17YJC820019)"大数据驱动下的法治系统工程创新路径研究"

摘　　要：《民法总则》第83条第2款规定,营利法人出资人滥用法人独立地位和出资人有限责任,逃避债务,严重损害债权人利益的,应当对法人债务承担连带责任。该款是《公司法》第20条公司法人格否认制度的"沿用"和"承袭",亦是《民法总则》"法人章"运用"复制"《公司法》立法技术的微观著例。从历史起源、域外立法、制度适用、司法运用等诸视角分析,公司法人格否认在《公司法》中就属于一项"极为特殊"的判例法制度,仅仅是有限责任和公司独立人格的补充和完善。公司法人格否认制度与《民法总则》所承载的私法"体系化"和"科学化"功能相悖。《民法总则》"法人章"在条文构造上运用"复制"《公司法》规范的做法,可能成为《公司法》制度创新的障碍,亦会造成规范适用上的冲突。＂ The general civil law＂ the 83th paragraph 2 forprofit corporate sponsor abusing independent legal person status and the investor co. , LTD. , to avoid debt, serious damage to the interests of the creditors, shall be jointly and severally liable to the corporate debt. The article is the ＂following＂ and ＂inherited＂ of article 20 of the company law. From the historical origin, such as the extraterritorial legislation, system applies, the judicial application perspective, the company law personality denial in the company law is a ＂very special＂ case law system, is only a supplement to the limited liability and independent company personality and perfect. The personality denial system of the company and the private law of the general principles of civil law are incompatible with the function of ＂systemization＂ and＂ scientization＂. Chapter ＂the general civil law legal person＂ in the structure of articles using the ＂copy＂ the practice of the company law standard, may is a barrier to the company law system innovation, will also cause conflict in specification applies.

关 键 词：民法总则 公司法人格否认 正当性 

分 类 号：DF411.91[政治法律—经济法学]