与核电生活在一起:环境风险治理中的信任逻辑研究  

Living with Nuclear Energy: Researching the Trust Relationship in the Risk Governance of Environmental Issues

作　　者：方芗[1] 张晓超 FANG Xiang;ZHANG Xiaochao(School of Sociology ＆ Anthropology,Sun Yet-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学社会学与人类学学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期22-31,共10页Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"核电的环境生态风险社会治理研究"(13YJC840009);教育部留学回国人员科研启动金资助项目

摘　　要：在当下能源供给转型、节能减排要求的实现及建设环境友好型社会的多重因素影响下,政府需要大力发展低碳能源,而核能是低碳能源的重要代表之一。然而,在核能发展过程中伴随而来的大众对核电项目环境风险的担忧以及对核电项目的反对已经成为了阻碍核能发展的重要问题。本研究在环境风险治理的理论框架下梳理了大众对于核电项目运营、管理者的信任逻辑,并对大亚湾核电站周边的43位当地居民进行访谈。研究发现,受访者对核电站的看法呈现出3个较明显的分类:恐惧及担忧、无奈地接受及不信任、习以为常。自福岛核电站事故以来,核风险在中国社会已经被放大,核工业受到"污名化"的影响。核电站周边居民普遍不愿意再建设新的核电项目,而居民所处的社会经济背景进一步影响了他们对核工业、传媒以及政府在核问题上的信任。In order to fulfill the requirement of energy-saving and emission-reduction,the government needs to develop low-carbon energy resources. Nuclear power has been considered as a reliable low-carbon energy resource. However,people＇s concern about the environmental risk of nuclear energy and their resisting activities have become major hinders to its development. This research analyses the trust relationship between operator and manager of civil nuclear power project under the framework of risk governance of environmental issues. The research team interviewed 43 local people near Daya Bay Nuclear Plant and found that their opinions about the nuclear power station fall into three distinguished categories： threat and worry,reluctant acceptance and distruse,normalization. After the Fukushima hazard,nuclear risk has been socially amplified. Nuclear industry has to face its stigma. Local residents are not willing to have new nuclear power stations built around them. The local social and economic contexts influence people＇s trust towards nuclear industry,media and the government.

关 键 词：环境风险治理 低碳能源 绿色发展 信任逻辑 

分 类 号：C912.6[经济管理] X32[社会学]