新兴权利保护中利益正当性的论证基准——以约为婚姻诱使他人与自己发生性关系的裁判立场为基础  

The Argument Benchmark of Legitimacy of the Interest in the Protection of Emerging Rights——Based on the judgment about the sex reduced by marriage promise

作　　者：张建文[1] ZHANG Jian-wen(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031 China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第7期15-24,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：张建文主持的司法部2016年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目<新生权利的理论与实践问题研究>(16SFB2001);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<新兴权利的基本问题研究>(16JJD820031)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在我国,对作为新兴权利的所谓贞操权(性自主权)的裁判有两种大相径庭的裁判结论,值得作为新兴权利保护利益正当性论证的重要问题。一是借鉴德国民法典故意违背善良风俗加害于他人的侵权行为类型,保护约为婚姻诱使他人与发生性关系案型中女性的贞操权;二是借鉴德国民法典关于女性性自主权的规定,强调两性平等和尊重男女性自主权,承认成年女性在性关系领域中的自我决定能力,同时也能够为自己的决定承担后果和责任,倾向于否定在所研究的案型中有值得保护的合法利益。这种两种直接相互抵牾的裁判立场中凸显了在具体的新兴权利保护中裁判基准选择的极端重要性,这种选择受到社会变迁和生活传统的强烈影响。There are two kinds of different referee conclusions on one of the emerging rights——virginity right（ the right to sexual autonomy）,which is typical in the legitimacy argument of the emerging right protection. One of the conclusion refers to the type of deliberate infringement of the good custom in German Civil Code,aiming at protecting the rights of the female in the case of sex with marriage promise. The other point borrows provisions on female sexual autonomy,tends to emphasize gender equality and respect the male and female sex autonomy,admits that adult women have sexual self-determination ability,and they are able to bear the consequences and responsibility for their decisions,thus denies the protect of wowen ＇s legal interests in this kind of case. The difference between these two points highlights the importance of benchmark in the protection of the emerging rights,the choose of which is always strongly influenced by the social change and life tradition.

关 键 词：新兴权利 利益正当性 贞操权 性自主权 一般人格权 值得受法律保护的利益 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]