检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋燕[1] SONG Yan(Qinghai Blood Center, Xining 810000 , China.)
机构地区:[1]青海省血液中心
出 处:《中国输血杂志》2018年第5期547-548,共2页Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
摘 要:目的通过分析传统和改进的滤白方法,探讨改进后的滤白方法在减少血袋破损,提高一次成浆率方面产生的效果。方法将全血滤除白细胞后,由母袋排尽空气的方法改为滤白之前将空母袋内空气排入采血袋内,对两种滤白方法离心后血袋破损率和一次成浆率进行统计分析。结果两种滤白方法离心后的血袋破损率和一次成浆率有显著性差异。结论本改进简单易行,有利于提高工作效率和血液利用率。Objective To investigate the impact of improved leukocyte filtration on the one-time plasma acquisition ratio in plasma product manufacture. Methods The traditional method extracts the air from the source bag after the leukocyte filtration process while the improved method extracts the air from the empty source bag into the blood collection bag before the leukocyte filtration process. The blood bag broken rates and the one-time plasma acquisition rates of the two methods were compared by statistical analysis. Results There were significant differences in both rates between the traditional and improved leukocyte filtration methods. Conclusion The improved method was simple and easy to perform. It helps to improve work efficiency of minimizes blood wastes.
分 类 号:R331.142[医药卫生—人体生理学] R457.14[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104