铜矿床勘查工程间距探讨  

Discussing on Copper Deposit Exploration Engineering Spacing

作　　者：周旭林 傅群和[1,2] 王宏宇 秦雅静[1] ZHOU Xulin;FU Qunhe;WANG Hongyu;QIN Yajing(Hunan Planning Institute of Land and Resources,Changsha,410007;Hunan Province Mineral Resources Reserves Evaluation Center,Changsha,410007)

机构地区：[1]湖南省国土资源规划院,长沙410007 [2]湖南省矿产资源储量评审中心,长沙410007

出　　处：《地质论评》2018年第4期885-894,共10页Geological Review

基　　金：国家矿产资源储量技术标准体系建设项目子课题--重要有色金属与贵金属及稀土稀有矿床合勘查程度研究(编号:CB2015-2-5)的成果~~

摘　　要：为了合理确定铜矿床勘查控制程度,为铜矿床勘查规范修订提供依据,作者收集了大量铜矿床勘查开发资料,开展探采对比研究。通过探采对比认为,现行《铜、铅、锌、银、镍、钼矿地质勘查规范》(DZ/T 0214-2002)确定的铜矿床勘查工程间距偏稀,需要适当调整,建议铜矿床第Ⅰ类型控制的勘查工程间距不变,第Ⅱ类型控制的勘查工程间距调整为80~100 m×60~100 m,第Ⅲ类型控制的勘查工程间距调整为40~60 m×40~60 m,小型铜矿床勘查类型均确定为第Ⅲ类型。Objectives： In order to reasonably determine the control degree of the exploration of copper deposits and provide a basis for the revision of the specifications for copper mineral exploration, the author have collected a large number of exploration and development data of copper deposits and conducted a comparative study on exploration and mining.Methods： Contrastive analysis of prospection and exploitation.Results： The copper deposit exploration engineering spacing slants spare in the current specifications for copper, lead, zinc, silver, nickeland molybdenum miaeral exploration（DZ/T 0214 2002）,it need appropriate adjustments.Conclusions：We suggest that the exploration engineering spacing of the first type remain unchanged; the exploration engineering spacing of the second type is adjusted for 80~100m×60~100m, the exploration engineering spacing of the third type is adjusted for 40~ 60 m×40~60 m, the small copper deposit exploration types were identified as the third type.

关 键 词：铜矿床 勘查类型 工程间距 探采对比 

分 类 号：P618.41[天文地球—矿床学]