检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曲艺[1,2,3] 龙花楼 QU Yi;LONG Hualou(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,CAS,Beijing 100101,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;Center for Assessment and Research on Targeted Poverty Alleviation,CAS,Beijing 100101,China;College of Resources and Environment,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049 [3]中国科学院精准扶贫评估研究中心,北京100101 [4]中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京100049
出 处:《地理学报》2018年第7期1226-1241,共16页Acta Geographica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(41731286)~~
摘 要:当前,18亿亩耕地"红线"的划定对中国耕地数量保护成效显著,但要实现保障粮食安全、促进农民增收的战略目标,更多的研究仍需聚焦在既定资源数量下的耕地利用隐性形态转型上。耕地利用隐性形态包含涉及不同学科的多重属性,其转型规律的刻画需建立在多学科综合研究框架基础之上。为此,研究结合中国耕地资源管理实践,分析了1949年以来耕地利用隐性形态转型历程,梳理了分散于管理学、经济学和社会学中的相关研究进展。结果表明,当前研究在区域性、综合性、多尺度性方面表现不足,这些不足不仅影响分析结果的准确性,也弱化了研究结论在耕地管理实践中的可推广性和可操作性。因此,本文提出在现有研究基础上引入地理学的研究理念和分析方法,通过开展多学科的综合研究弥补以上不足,并进而从概念框架、具体设计、实践运用三个层次,逐步深入和细化,提出了中国耕地利用隐性形态转型研究的多学科综合研究框架,阐述了这一框架的具体应用思路。Currently, the "farmland red line" management has made major achievements in the quantitative protection of Chinese farmland. However, the increase of grain production as well as the improvement of peasants' incomes still calls for more researches concentrated on the recessive farmland transition based on the current resources endowment. The recessive farmland morphology has multi-properties referring different disciplines. So the study of farmland transition needs a multi-disciplinary comprehensive research framework. This paper drew an outline of the farmland transition in China since its founding, and made an in-depth literature review from multi-disciplinary perspectives of management, economics and sociology. Previous research shows an inefficient performance from the aspect of locality,integrity and systematicness. The shortcomings above may weaken its application due to lack of popularization and operability. So the authors argue that, geographical ideology and analytical method should be introduced into current researches on recessive farmland transition. And multi-disciplinary comprehensive researches should be constructed to make up the existing deficiencies. Ultimately, from the conceptual level, the overall design level, and the practical application level, this paper puts forward a multi-disciplinary comprehensive research framework for the recessive farmland transition, and illustrates a concrete application from the problem-oriented perspective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229