检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨凯[1] 陶炜[1] 肖军[1] Yang Kai;Tao Wei;Xiao Jun(Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China)
机构地区:[1]东南大学能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室,南京210096
出 处:《发电设备》2018年第4期246-252,共7页Power Equipment
基 金:国家自然基金项目(51576047);国家973计划资助项目(2013CB228106)
摘 要:基于生命周期分析(ELCA)方法对生物质气化费托合成制取航空煤油进行了资源消耗和环境影响评价,并针对资源利用率、可再生性、环境性对系统副产品水蒸气供热和供电两种系统进行了综合性能评价和比较。结果表明:供热系统的资源利用率大于供电系统,供电系统为可再生系统,而供热系统属于不可再生系统;两个系统均可以从环境中得到正收益,供电系统得到的正收益更为显著;供电系统的资源性劣于供热系统,但环境性较优。By means of exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA), performance evaluations on resource consumptions and environmental impacts were carried out for jet fuel production via biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, while a comprehensive performance evaluation and comparison were conducted on both the heat- and power-supply systems using by-product steam from the aspects of resource conversion efficiency, reproducibility and environmental performance. Results show that the resource conversion efficiency of the heat supply system is higher than the power generation system, and the power generation system is renewable whereas the heat supply system is non-renewable. Both the systems can get positive benefit from environment, and that from the power generation system is more significant. The reproducibility of the power generation system is inferior to the heat supply system, but its environment performance is better.
分 类 号:TK63[动力工程及工程热物理—生物能]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.219.125