检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雪晶 王宝田[2] ZHANG Xuejing;WANG Baotian
机构地区:[1]中国人民银行长春中心支行,吉林长春130051 [2]中国人民银行松原市中心支行,吉林松原138000
出 处:《吉林金融研究》2018年第7期61-66,共6页Journal of Jilin Financial Research
摘 要:深入推进法律顾问(公职律师)制度是党中央、国务院依法治国方略的重要举措。日美是西方发达国家中中央银行制度较为完善且金融监管制度较为成熟的代表性国家,而二者深受各自大陆法系和英美法系法律制度的影响,形成了各自颇具特色的法律顾问(公职律师)制度。本文分别以日本金融法委员会和美国联邦储备委员会总法律顾问制度为例,比较二者制度的异同,对构建和完善中国金融监管机构法律顾问(公职律师)制度具有十分重要的借鉴意义。It is an important measure of the Party Central Committee and the State Council to advance the system of the the legal adviser(Public lawyer). U.S. and Japan are the representative countries that set up perfecter the system of cental bank and developed financial regulation in the West.They have formed their own distinctive legal counsel (public lawyer) system in deeply the influence of the legal system of Continental Law System and Anglo-American Law System. This paper take the Japanese Financial Law Commission and the Federal Reserve's General Counsel as examples respectively and analysis the system of the similarities and differences.The purpose is to draw lessons from foreign experiences for China’s financial regulators counsel (public lawyer) system .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229