论宏观仲裁法学的构建  

On the Construction of Macro-Arbitration Jurisprudence

作　　者：鲁洋[1] LU Yang(School of International Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beij ing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《吉首大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第4期119-128,共10页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家留学基金委联合培养博士生项目(201707070101)

摘　　要：宏观仲裁法学研究全部仲裁法律现象,讲求宏观研究思维和方法,是一门包含所有仲裁分支法学的整体学科。构建宏观仲裁法学因能避免仲裁研究的局部化和碎片化、确保仲裁分类的周延性和科学性、实现研究成果在不同分支间的类比和转化以及顺应分支趋同化、立法宏观化、案件多元化、类别新型化的仲裁实践趋势而具有必要性,并在外部法治环境和内部基本要素两方面具备可行性。构建宏观仲裁法学应通过找准学科定位、确立范畴架构、搭建学科结构构建其学科体系,通过以实践问题为导向、以学术传承和创新为宗旨、以科学合理的学术评价为助力构建其学术体系,通过内修话语思想与话语内容、外修传播途径与传播能力构建其话语体系。Macro-Arbitration Jurisprudence（MAJ）studies all legal phenomena of arbitration and emphasizes the thinking and methods of macroscopic research.It is a whole discipline including all branches of arbitration law.It is necessary to construct MAJ,because it can avoid the localization and fragmentation of arbitration studies,ensure comprehensive and scientific arbitration classifications,realize the analogy and transformation of academic outcomes of different branches,and conform to the arbitration practical trends like the assimilation of branches,macroscopic legislation,diversification of cases and the new-type categories.Additionally,it is also possible to construct MAJ in the external legal environment and the internal basic elements.The discipline system of MAJ should be focused on discipline orientation,category framework,and discipline structure,oriented by practical problems,aiming at academic inheritance and innovation,assisted by scientific academic evaluation.The discourse system of it can be constructed through enhancing discourse ideas and discourse content internally and promoting transmission routes and transmission capacity externally.

关 键 词：宏观仲裁法学 必要性 可行性 总体路径 

分 类 号：D990[政治法律—国际法学]