检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张若晨[1,2] 刘志洪 唐良友[1] 邹子君[1] 姜亮[1] 王玉杰[1] 梁嘉宇[1] 唐涌泉 卢一平 ZHANG Ruochen;LIU Zhihong;TANG Liangyou;ZOU Zijun;JIANG Liang;WANG Yujie;LIANG Jiayu;TANG Yongquan;LU Yiping(Department of Urology/Institute of Urology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610041,P.R.China;Department of Urology,Fufian Medical University Teaching Hospital / Fufian Provincial Hospital,Fuzhou,Fujian 350001,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西医院泌尿外科/泌尿外科研究所,成都610041 [2]福建医科大学省立临床医学院/福建省立医院泌尿外科,福州350001
出 处:《华西医学》2018年第7期869-876,共8页West China Medical Journal
基 金:福建省自然科学基金(2016J05177);福建省卫生与计划生育中青年骨干项目(2016-ZQN-6);四川省科技厅项目(2014JY0183;2017SZ0123);成都市科技局项目(2014-HM01-00301-SF);四川大学华西医院学科卓越发展1-3-5工程项目
摘 要:目的对肾移植术后应用程序性活检(protocol biopsy,PB)指导临床诊疗提升患者预后的效果进行系统评价与Meta分析。方法检索Pub Med、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、万方、维普数据库从建库至2018年5月期间的相关文献,收集所有比较肾移植后根据PB结果及时进行相关干预与仅依据临床经验进行常规治疗患者之间疗效差异的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT),评价纳入研究质量,提取有效数据,采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果最终纳入6篇RCT共698例受试者。PB组与常规治疗组之间的1年与2年受者生存率差异无统计学意义[1年:相对危险度(relative risk,RR)=0.99,95%置信区间(confidence interval,CI)(0.97,1.01),P=0.39;2年:RR=1.00,95%CI(0.97,1.02),P=0.72],两组术后1年与2年移植肾存活率差异亦无统计学意义[1年:RR=1.01,95%CI(0.99,1.04),P=0.29;2年:RR=1.02,95%CI(0.99,1.06),P=0.19];两组平均肾小球滤过率差异无统计学意义[均数差(mean difference,MD)=0.45 m L/(min·1.73 m2),95%CI(–3.77,4.67)m L/(min·1.73 m2),P=0.83],PB组血清肌酐低于对照组[MD=–0.46 mg/d L,95%CI(–0.63,–0.29)mg/d L,P<0.000 01]。随访期间两组感染率差异无统计学意义[RR=1.23,95%CI(0.69,2.19),P=0.48]。结论现有证据不支持术后常规对移植肾行PB。然而受限于较小的样本量与较短的随访时间,是否需要在特定人群中施行PB仍需要大样本、长期的RCT研究来明确。Objective To conduct a Meta-analysis to determine the clinical effect of protocol biopsy(PB)-monitored therapy after renal transplantation. Methods Pub Med, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Standards Database and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals were searched for trials comparing the efficacy of timely intervention under PB surveillance with the conventional treatment.The quality of included studies was assessed and Meta-analysis was conducted by Rev Man 5.3 software. Results Six randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria, including 698 cases. No significant difference was found between the PB group and the control group in 1-year [relative risk(RR)=0.99, 95% confidence interval(CI)(0.97, 1.01), P=0.39]and 2-year recipient survival rate [RR=1.00, 95%CI(0.97, 1.02), P=0.72]. Graft survival rate after 1 year [RR=1.01, 95%CI(0.99, 1.04), P=0.29] and 2 years [RR=1.02, 95%CI(0.99, 1.06), P=0.19] were also statistically similar. No statistical difference was found in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups [mean difference(MD)=0.45 mL/(min·1.73 m^2),95%CI(–3.77, 4.67) mL/(min·1.73 m^2), P=0.83]. Renal function of PB group, monitored by serum creatinine, was superior to the control group [MD=–0.46 mg/d L, 95%CI(–0.63, –0.29) mg/d L, P〈0.000 01]. No statistical difference was found in infection between the two groups [RR=1.23, 95%CI(0.69, 2.19), P=0.48]. Conclusions Our study did not suggest PB for every kidney transplantation recipient. However, long-term randomized controlled trials with larger sample size would be necessary to determine whether PB was effective for specific populations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15