检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘照东[1] PAN Zhao-dong(The Law School,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《河南机电高等专科学校学报》2018年第2期56-59,共4页Journal of Henan Mechanical and Electrical Engineering College
摘 要:防卫限度是法律明文规定的防卫行为行使所应遵循的合理限度,也是衡量防卫行为是否造成过度损害的客观标准。对于明显超出制止不法侵害必要限度造成重大损害的正当防卫行为以防卫过当论处,需承担刑事责任。但若是针对严重危及人身安全的暴力犯罪,却又可能构成法律所允许的特殊防卫。在司法实践中对于防卫过当以及特殊防卫的认定颇为棘手,对于明显超过必要限度的界定、"明显超过必要限度"与"造成重大损害"的关系以及对特殊防卫权行使的限制值得深入探讨。The defense limit is the reasonable limit to be followed in the exercise of the defense act expressly stipulated by the law and is also an objective measure of whether the defense action causes undue damage to the other party. Legitimate defense that significantly exceed the necessary limits to prevent unlawful infringement is subject to criminal liability but can be mitigated. Acts that result in serious injury, however, can be criminalized, but acts against serious personal injury Violent crimes, they may constitute a special defense permitted by law. In the judicial practice, the determination of over-defendse and special-defense is rather tricky. For those definitions that clearly exceed the necessary limits, the relationship between "obviously exceeding the necessary limit" and "causing significant damage" and the restrictions on the exercise of special defense rights should be discussed in depth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.50.27