检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王婧妍[1] 初建平[1] 赵静[1] 李欣蓓[1] 王玉亮[1] 严序 WANG Jing-yan;CHU Jian-ping;ZHAO Jing(Department of Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510080,China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院放射科,广州510080 [2]西门子医疗,上海201318
出 处:《放射学实践》2018年第7期664-667,共4页Radiologic Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(81201074);中央高校基本科研业务费(中山大学青年教师培育计划;13ykpy14)
摘 要:目的:回顾性探讨神经突起方向离散度与密度成像(NODDI)参数对胶质瘤分级的诊断价值。方法:高、低级别胶质瘤共29例,男18例、女11例,平均年龄45岁,其中高级别胶质瘤16例,低级别胶质瘤13例。患者术前行常规MRI及高级扩散扫描,经后处理软件得到神经突内体积分数图(ficvf)和神经突方向离散度图(ODI),分别测量肿瘤实性区域(TP)、瘤周水肿区域(PT)和对侧正常参照区域的ficvf_(mean)、ficvf_(min)、ficvf_(max)、ODI_(mean)、ODI_(min)和ODI_(max)值,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行比较分析。结果:低级别胶质瘤和高级别胶质瘤肿瘤实质区ficvf各参数值均较正常对照区低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高级别胶质瘤肿瘤实质区ficvf、ODI值均比低级别胶质瘤肿瘤实质区要高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高级别胶质瘤瘤周水肿区个别ficvf、ODI值比低级别胶质瘤肿瘤实质区要低,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);独立参数肿瘤实性区ficvf、ODI的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)均大于0.5(P<0.05),其中肿瘤实质区ficvf_(mean)、ficvf_(max)值的AUC均为0.81。结论:NODDI参数ficvf、ODI能鉴别高低级别胶质瘤,其中ficvf值效果更优。Objective:The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of neuronaloriented dispersibility and density imaging(NODDI)parameters in glioma grading.Methods:29 patients(13 low-grade gliomas including 9 males and 4 females,with 45-year-old mean age;16 high-grade gliomas including 9 males and 7 females,with 52-year-old mean age)were prospectively recruited undergo whole-brain NODDI examination.Intracellular volume fraction(ficvf)and orientation dispersion index(ODI)maps were derived.ROIs were manually placed on tumor parenchyma(TP),peritumoral area(PT)and contralateral normal-appearing white matter.The average values of ficvf and ODI were calculated and their diagnostic efficiency was assessed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC).Results:The ficvf values in the TP area of high-grade gliomas and low-grade gliomas were significantly lower than those in the normal control group(P〈0.05).The ficvf and ODI values in the TP and PT area of high-grade gliomas were significantly higher than those in low-grade gliomas(P〈0.05).The area under the ROC curve of ficvf and ODI was greater than 0.5(P〈0.05),while the area under curve of ficvfmeanand ficvfmax was 0.81.Conclusion:NODDI parameters ficvf and ODI have a good predicting value in gliomas grading,ficvf is better than ODI.
关 键 词:磁共振成像 神经突起方向离散度与密度成像 胶质瘤 术前分级
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R739.41[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74