检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪国平[1] WANG Guo-ping(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2018年第4期89-95,共7页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:西南政法大学2017年度校级科研十九大激励重点项目"以习近平法治思想开启检察事业新时代"(2017XZJL-10)
摘 要:司法责任制是司法改革的核心内容之一,检察机关在确保检察人员能维护社会公平正义上一直都在进行着制度设计,其核心是通过司法责任追究来倒逼案件质量提升。本文通过对检察机关司法责任追究与免责范围的制度梳理与考察,总结出我国在司法责任追究制度上存在着理念上的"机械主义"、重责任轻保障、概念界定和追责含义上的不确定性等问题,应通过扩大和细化检察人员免责范围的方式达到对检察人员司法责任追究与履职保障的平衡,确保检察权的有效和正确行使。Judicial liability system is one of the core contents of the current judicial reform. The procuratorial organs have been carrying out the system design in ensuring that the procurators can maintain social fairness and justice. The core of the system is to improve the quality of the case through judicial liability.This paper analyses the scope of the judicial liability of accountability and exemption, summarizes the problems,including the mechanics of the judicial liability system's idea,the heavy responsibility and the light protection,the uncertain conceptual definition and the meaning of the liability. These issues should be solved by expanding and redefining the scope of the judicial liability of accountability and exemption,to ensure the effective and correct exercise of the procuratorial power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117