检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚明 陈广明 YAO Ming;CHEN Guang-ming
机构地区:[1]铜陵学院 [2]池州市中级人民法院
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2018年第4期107-116,共10页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
摘 要:被称为"常回家看看"条款的《老年人权益保障法》第18条,自2013年7月1日正式生效以来已四年有余。基于四年来全国各级法院审结的老年人精神赡养诉讼案件分析来看,目前还存在老年人不愿拿起法律武器主张精神赡养权益,参加诉讼缺乏专业法律人士庭审帮助,同案不同判现象较为突出等问题。问题的生成既有立法的缺陷,亦有道德支撑的不足。强化老年人精神赡养权益的保障与维护,确保其真正获得家庭温暖与精神慰藉,需要法律与道德的双轮驱动。The eighteenth article of the Law of Protecting the Senior Rights,known as"Regular Home Visit",has been implement more than four years since its formal entry into force in July 1,2013. Based on the analysis of the elderly cases,there are some problems such as the senior people dislike to protect their spiritual right with the legal weapons,lack of help from professional legal woker in court trials and different judgment in the same case,etc. The formation of the problem is not only the defect of legislation,but also the lack of moral support. So it is necessary to strengthen the law and morality to protect the senior rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120