检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李祥云[1] 张建顺[1] 陈珊 LI Xiang - yun;ZHANG Jian - shun;Chen Shan(School of Public Finance and Taxation,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,Chin)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学财政税务学院,武汉430073
出 处:《云南财经大学学报》2018年第8期3-13,共11页Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:基于1995~2013年的省级面板数据,通过构建Tobit模型,使用滞后生均公共教育支出解决模型内生性问题,从经验研究角度考察中国公共教育支出对居民收入分配不平等的影响。实证结果发现:中国公共教育支出缩小了居民收入分配差距,这主要是由公共教育支出增加所导致的教育扩展压缩效应和公共教育支出的公平分布共同引起的。运用多个公共教育支出的替代指标以及进行分地区稳健性检验,其结果均证明模型结论是稳健的。要进一步发挥中国公共教育支出缩小居民收入差距的作用,今后在继续加大公共教育支出力度的同时,还应优化公共教育支出的结构,注重公共教育支出的公平分配。Based bit model and uses the on the provincial panel data from 1995 to 2013, this paper constructs a To- lagged public education expenditure per student to solve the endogenous problems in the model. From the perspective of empirical research, this paper examines the impact of public education expenditure on the income distribution inequality in China. The empirical re- suits show that the public education expenditure in China narrows the gap of residential income distribution, which is mainly caused by the expansion effect of education and the fair distribution of public education expenditure due to the increase of public education expenditure. By using mul- tiple alternative indicators of public education expenditure and the regional robustness test, results show that the model' s conclusions are robust. To make public education expenditure play the role on reducing the income gap between residents in our country, in the future, while increasing pub- lic education expenditure, we should also optimize the structure of public expenditure on education and pay equal attention to the fair distribution of public education expenditure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244