检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:武娟[1] 张明耿[1] 宋施岐 谢小晓[1] WU Juan;ZHANG Ming-geng;SONG Shi-qi;XIE Xiao-xiao(Deyang People's Hospital,Deyang,Sichuan 618000)
出 处:《按摩与康复医学》2018年第17期76-77,共2页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨TCD诊断颅内脑动脉狭窄的临床价值。方法:将50例确诊为颅内脑动脉狭窄的患者纳入观察组,30例健康体检者纳入对照组,对两组对象大脑前动脉、大脑中动脉、大脑后动脉、基底动脉进行TCD检查后行MRA检查,比较其诊断结果。结果:两组患者平均血管流速差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且TCD检出率与MRA诊断差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TCD可准确诊断颅内脑动脉狭窄,可作为临床辅助性检查方法。Objective: To investigate the clinical value of TCD in diagnosis of intracranial cerebral artery stenosis. Methods: 50 cases of patients with intracranial cerebral artery stenosis were included in observation group while 30 cases of healthy people were in control group, detected their anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery and basilar artery by TCD then carried out MRA examination, and compared the diagnostic results of the two groups. Results: There was statistical difference of mean vascular flow velocity between the groups(P〈0.05), and there was no statistical difference between detection rates of TCD and MRA(P〉0.05). Conclusion: TCD can accurately diagnose intracranial cerebral artery stenosis, which can be a clinical assistant examination method.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222