城市中心区紧凑度量化评价与分析——广州珠江新城与香港中环对比研究  

QUANTIFIED EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE COMPACTNESS OF URBAN CENTER: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ZHUJIANG NEW TOWN OF GUANGZHOU AND CENTRAL HONG KONG

作　　者：金俊[1] 齐康[1] 张静宇 张曼[3] JIN Jun, QI Kang,ZHANG Jingyu, ZHANG Man

机构地区：[1]东南大学建筑研究所 [2]浙江绿城建筑设计有限公司 [3]北京交通大学

出　　处：《城市规划》2018年第6期47-56,共10页City Planning Review

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(51378100):基于中微观尺度评价的城市空间形态紧凑度定量研究;国家自然科学基金项目(51278108):宜居环境的整体建筑学研究

摘　　要：以广州珠江新城和香港中环为案例,从经济、高效、舒适三个维度,构建CBD紧凑度指标体系。通过指标比值法消除数据量纲并进行对比,结果显示香港中环经济性和高效性明显较高,二者舒适度基本持平。分析对比评价结果,得出影响CBD紧凑度的三个主要影响因素:历史文化、空间管控措施和空间形态设计,并研究这些影响因素对城市中心区紧凑度的作用机制。Choosing Zhujiang New Tow of Guangzhou and Central Hong Kong as the study cases, this paper starts from economic, efficient, and comfortable dimensions to build compactness index system of CBD. By using index-ratio method to eliminate data dimension and then comparing the data, the results show that Central Hong Kong behaves much better in economy and efficiency degree, and the two are basically equal in comfort degree. It then analyzes and compares the evaluation results, and concludes three main influencing factors of CBD compactness, i.e., influence of historic culture, spatial control measure, and spatial form design. And the action mechanism of these influencing factors to the central city compactness is also studied.

关 键 词：城市中心区 紧凑度 量化评价 广州珠江新城 香港中环 

分 类 号：TU981[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]