邦联条例和联邦宪法结构差异性原因探析  

On the Analysis of Reasons of Differences of Structure between the Articles of Confederation and the American Constitution

作　　者：李晓波 Li Xiaobo(The School of law,Zhejiang University of Finance and Ecornomics,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018)

机构地区：[1]浙江财经大学法学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2018年第4期81-88,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"宪法价值评价研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:14BFX026)

摘　　要：邦联条例和联邦宪法在实质性权力、概括性条款、全国政府权力来源、保证性条款、宪法的修改与批准以及保留权力等结构方面存在差异,产生这种差异性的原因在于制宪者对宪法本质、州的主权、联合方式,以及对传统政治共同体理论等方面认识的不同。从宪法认知角度分析邦联条例与联邦宪法结构差异性原因,有助于深刻理解这两部宪法结构不同的认识论根源。The Articles of Confederation and the Federal Constitution cause differences in substantive power, general provisions, sources of national government power, guarantee clauses, amendment and ratification of the constitution, and reservation of power between the two constitutions. The reason of the difference lies in the different understanding of the constitution nature, the sovereignty of the state, the joint mode, and the transcendence of the traditional political community theory of framers. It is helpful to understand the epistemological root of the difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Federal Constitution from the perspective of constitutional cognition.

关 键 词：邦联条例 联邦宪法 宪法结构 国家结构 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]