抗战前期美国远东政策转变原因新探  

New Explorations on the Reasons for the Change of American Far East Policy in the Early Stage of the Anti-Japanese War

作　　者：陈志刚[1] 李沛乐 Chen Zhigang;Li Peile(School of History Culture and Ethnology of Southwest University,Chongqing,The Research Center of Great Rear Area of the Anti-Japanese War,Chongqing 400715;Crofton House School of Canadian Vancouver,Vancouver V6N3E 1)

机构地区：[1]西南大学历史文化学院、重庆中国抗战大后方研究中心,重庆400715 [2]加拿大温哥华克罗夫顿豪斯学校Croton House School,温哥华V6N 3E1

出　　处：《重庆社会科学》2018年第7期120-128,共9页Chongqing Social Sciences

摘　　要：卢沟桥事变爆发后不久,美国将远东政策的基调定位为不干涉并致力于保护在华权益,日本政府对此亦三番五次予以保证。尽管如此,伴随中日战争的不断扩大,美国在华权益频遭日本在华军事当局的严重侵犯,美国政府虽多次抗议,但终无效果。此后,美国远东政策由消极转变为积极,具体表现为道义禁运、桐油借款、废除《美日商约》等经济制裁手段的先后出台。日本对美国在华权益的侵犯,成为推动美国远东政策转变的重要原因。After the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War in 1937, with the continuous expansion of the war, the American rights and interests in China were frequently violated by the Japanese military authorities in China. Although the American government had repeatedly protested, the effect was extremely rare. Even if there were serious incidents such as the ＂Paname,＂ the violations by Japanese military authorities in China had not diminished. Since then, the American Far East policy had shifted from negative to positive, which was manifested as the economic sanctions such as the Moral Embargo,the Tung Oil Loan and the Abolition of the US-Japan Commercial Treaty. Japan＇s invasion of American interests in China had become an important reason for the shift of American Far East policy.

关 键 词：道义禁运 桐油借款 美日商约 

分 类 号：D871.2[政治法律—政治学]