人身危险性之体系定位  

The systematical location of personal dangerousness

作　　者：冯文杰 FENG Wen-jie(Law School, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Chin)

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《青岛科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期103-108,116,共7页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金资助项目(13BFX057)

摘　　要：人身危险性应当被定位于量刑根据、行刑领域刑罚变更根据以及保安处分发动根据。对刑事实证学派与刑事古典学派进行折中的观点,通常不是"罪刑相适应",而是对报应刑与预防刑的取舍。量刑需要坚持量刑个别化原则。量刑合理与否的判定因素是指责任刑(报应刑)与预防刑的具体评判过程是否合理,而不是直接以量刑结果差异来判定案件量刑的结果是否合理。刑罚的施加以责任为前提,而保安处分的施加并不以责任为前提。只要依据形式合法性和实质合理性原则构建保安处分制度,必然可以在人权保障与社会防卫间取得更好的平衡效果。Personal dangerousness should be positioned as the basis of sentencing, the basis of penalty changes in the field of execution and the basis for taking the security measures. The compromise between the criminal positivism school and the criminal classical school is not ＂suiting punishment to crimes,＂ but the proper selection between the retribution and the prevention punishment. Sentencing should adhere to the principle of individualized sentencing, and the determining factor of the reasonableness of sentencing is the reasonableness of the specific judgment process of liability punishment（retribution punishment） and the prevention punishment, rather than the result of sentencing. The application of penalty rather than the security measure is premised on the responsibility. As long as the security disciplinary system is constructed on the basis of formal legality and substantive rationality, it will inevitably achieve a better balance between human rights protection and social defense.

关 键 词：人身危险性 量刑根据 量刑个别化 保安处分 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]