检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省卫生防疫站,河南郑州450003 [2]商丘市卫生防疫站,河南商丘476000
出 处:《河南预防医学杂志》2002年第5期265-266,共2页Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine
基 金:.NULL.
摘 要:目的 为寻求对诊断猪囊虫病的简便易行的方法,方法 RIHA、ELISA、DOT-ELISA三种不同的检测方法对猪囊尾蚴患者血清特异循环抗原CAg,进行对比分析,结果 三种检测方法检出率分别为90%,91.7%,91.7%。结论 尤其RIHA法具有操作简单,结果稳定,特异性敏感性高等优点,适宜门诊及大面积调查工作。ELISA、DOT-ELISA法检出率稍高于反向RIHA,但重复性稍差,且操作较繁杂。<Abstrcat>In order to seek a easy and convenient method to diagnose patiente with cycsticercosis By means of RIHA ELISA DOT-ELIST methods,we detect the CAg from the serum of patients with cerebral cysticrosis and compare the three metheds ,Results showed the positive rate of the three methods are 90.0%?91.7%?91.7%?respectively But compared with the other two methods the RIHA methods is more easy to operate,the result of it is more steady and more specific.It's suitable to be used in outpatient and large area investgation ELISA.DOT-ELISA methods scratator of rate is somewhat bigher that of RIHA,The inspect rate of ELISA,DOT-ELISA methods somewhat hisher than RIHA The inspect rate of ELISA ,DOT-ELISA methods is somewhat higher than of RIHA ,but it's difficult to repeat and inconve·ent to operate.
关 键 词:囊虫病 RIHA ELISA DOT-ELISA 循环抗原 双醛法 夹心法 血清免疫诊断
分 类 号:R532.330.4[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15