检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童美华 陈墀成[1] TONG Mei hua;CHEN CHI-cheng(School of Philosophy,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian,China)
出 处:《福建行政学院学报》2018年第3期11-17,共7页Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
基 金:2016教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(16JD710009)
摘 要:19世纪科技发展与生态破坏并行,科技是否具有生态价值在理论上是一个长期争论的话题。马克思恩格斯认为科技具有巨大的生态价值:科技发展可促进人生态意识的养成;提高土地的人口承载力,推动农业生态化;提高资源能源利用率,减少生产排泄物,保护环境;有助于改良自然环境。科技生态价值背离的根源不在于科技,而在于资本主义制度和不合理的科学认识论。必须对科技和社会制度进行双重变革,以谋求科技生态价值的复归。In the 19 th century,the development of science and technology and the destruction of environment are in parallel.Whether science and technology have ecological value is a long controversial topic in theory.Marx and Engels believed that science and technology have great ecological value:the development of science and technology can promote the cultivation of human ecological consciousness,improve the population carrying capacity of land,promote agricultural ecology,improve the utilization rate of resources and energy,reduce the excreta of production,protect the environment,and help to improve the natural environment.The root of the deviation of the ecological value of science and technology lies not in science and technology but in the capitalist system and irrational scientific epistemology.We must make double changes in science and technology and social system so as to seek the return of the ecological value of science and technology.
分 类 号:A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] G3[文化科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40