“准绑架罪”问题研究及解决思路  

On Quasi-kidnapping

作　　者：李雪健 LI Xue-jian(Department of Law,People＇s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038 China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学法学院,北京100038

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2018年第3期40-45,共6页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：相比较外国刑法和其他地区,掳人后另起勒索意图的行为评价不一,多利用相关立法以绑架罪一罪或并合犯论处。我国实践中以数罪论处,但存在双重评价疑问,如"陈孝玉拐卖儿童、绑架案"一案以吸收犯理论进而以绑架罪一罪处理更为合理。对于这种情况,绑架罪既遂标准为向第三人实施勒赎行为。同时,该种绑架罪要受到绑架罪的体系限制,应对绑架罪做实质性理解以限缩处罚。In the criminal laws of Germany, Japan and Taiwan District of China,the act of redemption after controlling others＇ personal freedom is regarded as the crime of kidnapping by using related theories. However, China＇s traditional criminal law can＇t really deal with this situation as there is no clear concept of the combination of criminal offense. This situation is judged according to several charges in practice, but there is a flaw in the theory, that is, the absence of the behavior of kidnapping. In the case of ＂Chen Xiaoyu＇s abducting children, kidnapping＂,the principle of absorption offense should be adopted and the case should be regarded as one crime namely kidnapping. Through the study, we can conclude that the accomplished standard of ＂the crime of quasi-kidnapping＂ is carrying out redemption to the third person. In the meantime, ＂the crime of quasi-kidnapping＂should be restricted by the system of kidnapping and it is necessary to achieve the system of the crime of kidnapping on the means.

关 键 词：绑架罪 吸收犯 非法拘禁行为 另起犯意 单一法益单一行为说 利用事前状态型 

分 类 号：DF624[政治法律—刑法学]