反渎职侵权:作为监察权监督的一种方式  

Anti-malfeasance: As a Way of Supervising Supervision

作　　者：苏志强[1] SU Zhi-qiang(School of Law,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《北京社会科学》2018年第7期4-11,共8页Social Sciences of Beijing

摘　　要：国家监察体制改革将纪检监察部门、检察机关中的职务犯罪预防和侦查部门整合成一个整体,形成了对国家机关及其工作人员监督的全覆盖。与庞大的监察机构相伴而生的就是谁来监督和制约监察权的问题。反渎职侵权职能是检察权作为法律监督权的一项重要职能,检察机关反渎职侵权职能的保留,既体现了检察权作为法律监督权应有的职能,也实现了对监察权的外部监督,解决了谁来监督监察机构的问题,同时也有利于打击渎职侵权犯罪和保护当事人权利。The reform of supervision system integrates the discipline inspection supervision departments and procuratorial organs of the duty crime prevention and investigation departments into one, supervising the state organs and their staff totally. One of the problems associated with a large monitoring body is who will supervise and restrict the power of supervision. Anti-malfeasance function is an important function of the prosecutorial power as the right of legal supervision, the procuratorial organs retain anti-malfeasance functions, not only embodies the prosecutorial power as the right of legal supervision functions, realize the external supervision of the supervision power, solve the problem of who supervise the supervisory organizations, but also protection for dereliction of duty to combat and the rights of the parties.

关 键 词：监察委员会 反渎职侵权 检察权 监察权 

分 类 号：D926.3[政治法律—法学]