“越界迁移”农民尊严问题的思考与表现——《骆驼祥子》与《泥鳅》叙述乡下人进城故事比较  

Reflection on Farmers' Dignity in Trans-regional Migration: A Comparison Between Migration Stories in Camel Xiangzi and The Muddy

作　　者：王永兵 WANG Yongbing(School of Liberal Arts,Anqing Normal University,Anqing 246011,Anhui,China)

机构地区：[1]安庆师范大学文学院,安徽安庆246011

出　　处：《安庆师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第2期24-30,共7页Journal of Anqing Normal University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：安徽省教育厅人文社科重大项目"新时期中国改革与文学叙述关系研究"(sk2014zd040);安徽省学术技术带头人及后备人选资助项目"新时期中国文学的改革想象与叙述"(2014H015)

摘　　要：《骆驼祥子》和《泥鳅》都与中国现代化进程中大规模农村人口流入城市的历史背景有关。由于具体写作语境的不同,老舍与尤凤伟分别从城乡文化冲突和城乡差别的角度关注乡下人越界迁移后的命运;老舍意在解释生活、表现感情,尤凤伟志在再现农民工的不公平待遇并为之鸣不平。这种表现与再现两种截然不同的创作方法源于作家文学观和社会立场的不同。由乡下人进城引发的城乡冲突归因于农民对市民的身份僭越,思考如何维护这些进城农民的尊严,尤其是要思考当他们面临金钱的诱惑和人格凌辱时,如何用文学的方式来体现和表现其个人的尊严,这是历史赋予作家的使命,也是衡量一个作家是否具有历史意识与责任感的标志。Both Camel Xiangzi and The Muddy are about the historical process of farmers＇ large-scale migration to the urban areas in China＇s modernization course. With different writing contexts, LAO She and YOU Fengwei paid attention to rural people＇s fate after their trans-regional migration from the angles of urban-rural cultural conflicts and urban-rural differences respectively. LAO She intended to explain life and express feelings, while YOU Fengwei represented unfair treatment of migrant workers and cried for justice for them. These two different writing approaches originated from the writers＇ different literary concepts and social standpoints. Urban-rural conflicts out of rural people＇s trans-regional migration should be attributed to the transformation of farmers＇ social status. It is a mission that history entrusted to the writes to think how to maintain the dignity of migrated farmers, especially how to present their dignity while facing temptation of money and the abuse of personality through literary approach. This is also a measure for judging whether a writer has a sense of historical consciousness and responsibility or not.

关 键 词：农民 越界迁移 比较 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学]