检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:简筱昊 HAN Mei(Law school,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《湖北职业技术学院学报》2018年第2期83-89,共7页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute
摘 要:职业型乞讨行为具有严重的社会危害性,不仅会侵害公民的人身财产权利、影响公共环境卫生、扰乱公共场所秩序,而且会破坏社会总体信任度。该社会危害性作用于两个方向:一是面向被迫乞讨者,二是面向被乞讨者与公共秩序和安宁。我国现行刑法对职业型乞讨行为的规制存在保护法益的错位、行为方式的局限、行为对象范围的狭窄以及相关罪名衔接不畅等缺陷。为了实现对职业型乞讨行为的有效规制,一方面需要将"组织残疾人、儿童乞讨罪"修改为"组织乞讨罪"以应对面向被迫乞讨者的侵害行为;另一方面需要新增"职业型乞讨罪"以应对面向被乞讨者与公共秩序和安宁的侵害行为。Professional begging behavior has turned out to be of serious social harmfulness. It not only infringes on the citizens' personal and property rights,affects public environmental sanitation,disturbs public order,but also undermines the overall degree of social trust. The above-mentioned social harmfulness has two directions: one is the forced beggar and the other is the begged and public order and peace. The regulation in China's current criminal law concerning professional begging has the defects of the protection of legal interests,the limitation of behaviors,the narrow scope of the behavior object and the lack of cohesion for related charges. In order to achieve effective regulations for professional begging behaviors,on the one hand there is need to revise "the crime of organizing the disabled and children to beg"as "the crime of organizing begging"to deal with the infringement on the forced beggars and on the other hand it is suggested to add a"professional begging crime"to cope with the injurious act on the begged and public order and peace.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249