检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:饶常林[1] 黄诗凡 RAO Changlin;HUANG Shifan
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学
出 处:《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第5期24-33,共10页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目"区域公共事务治理中的政府协同机制研究"(项目编号:14BGL114)
摘 要:公共自行车作为城市准公共物品,其供给模式直接关系项目运营的绩效。武汉市公共自行车项目经历了从"政府引导+市场运作"的私营模式到"政府投入+国企运营"的公营模式的变迁,虽然供给主体和资金来源各不相同,但依然没有脱离垄断供给的桎梏。在对前期私营模式失败原因及后期公营模式局限性分析的基础上,认为城市公共自行车服务的有效供给并不在于公营或是私营的模式选择,而在于是否形成了有效的竞争机制,在于政府、市场、社会的多元参与和正确的角色定位。The supply mode of public bicycles,the urban quasi-public goods,is directly related to the performance of the project operation. Wuhan public bicycle project has experienced the transition from private mode of government guidance and market operation to the public mode of government investment and state-owned enterprises operation.Although the supplier and capital source are different,the project still has not thrown off the shackles of monopoly supply.On the basis of analyzing the reason why the previous private mode has failed and the limitations of the present public mode,this paper argues that the effective supply of urban public bicycle service lies in both the formation of effective competition mechanism,and the participation of government,market and society,as well as their accurate role definition,rather than merely the selection of public or private mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222