检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄岸坤[1] 周幸强[1] HUANG Ankun, ZHOU Xingqiang(ENT Department, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou 516000, China)
机构地区:[1]惠州市中心人民医院耳鼻喉科,广东惠州516000
出 处:《临床医学工程》2018年第6期689-690,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基 金:惠州市科技计划项目(2017Y012)
摘 要:目的评价鼻内镜下经口进路等离子消融切除腺样体的临床疗效。方法 120例行腺样体切除术的腺样体肥大患儿,随机分为两组各60例。观察组行鼻内镜下经口进路等离子切除术,对照组行鼻内镜下腺样体电动切割术,比较两组的临床疗效。结果观察组的手术时间、手术出血量、恢复通气时间均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组的治疗总有效率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。观察组的术后并发症发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论鼻内镜下经口进路等离子消融切除腺样体的临床疗效显著。Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transoral radiofrequency ablation under endoscopic sinus in the resection ofadenoids. Methods 120 cases of adenoid hypertrophy children with adenoidectomy were randomly divided into two groups equally. The observation group was treated with transoral radiofrequency ablation under endoscopic sinus for resection, and the control group was treated with adenooid electrokinetic cutting under endoscopic sinus. The clinical curative effects were compared bwtween two groups. Results The operation time, operative blood loss and ventilation recovery time o f the observation group was significantly better than that o f the control group (P 〈0.05). No statistical difference was found in the total effective rate between the two groups (P 〉0.05). The incidence o f postoperative complications ofthe observation group was significantly lower than that ofthe control group (P 〈0.05). Conclusions Transoral radiofrequency ablation under endoscopic sinus in the resection ofadenoids has significant clinical efficacy.
分 类 号:R766.3[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.64.92