检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴子恒 祝健[1] WU Ziheng;ZHU Jian(School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,Chin)
机构地区:[1]合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院,安徽合肥230009
出 处:《合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版)》2018年第6期828-832,共5页Journal of Hefei University of Technology:Natural Science
摘 要:文章对顶板辐射和地板辐射供冷2种空调系统进行对比后发现,地板辐射空调系统室内空气温度可能高于顶板辐射空调系统,但是地板辐射对人体的辐射量远大于顶板辐射,并且新风在地板辐射系统中能够更快地送入人员活动区,其除热效率更高,因此地板辐射供冷系统对人体的作用效果并不逊色于顶板辐射供冷。基于计算流体动力学(computational fluid dynamics,CFD)进行模拟验证,结果表明,顶板辐射与地板辐射2种方式供冷的误差不超过16%,考虑到室内模型布置较为复杂,误差在可接受范围内。It can be found that the air temperature in floor radiant cooling system is higher than that in roof radiant cooling system,but the radiant level of the former is far higher than that of the latter after contrasting these two kinds of systems.Furthermore,fresh air can enter into the active area faster in floor radiant cooling system.It is more efficient to remove heat in floor radiant cooling system.So the floor radiant cooling system is not inferior to the roof radiant cooling system.The result of the simulation using computational fluid dynamics(CFD)shows that the error of two kinds of radiant cooling modes is 16% at most,which is acceptable in consideration of the complex indoor models.
关 键 词:毛细管 置换通风 计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟
分 类 号:TU831.5[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.131.13.93