实然与应然之间:我国体育人文社会学研究的“逻辑裂隙”  

Real and Natural: Logical Rift in Sports Sociological Studies

作　　者：张晓义[1] 王道杰 ZHANG Xiaoyi;WANG Daojie(Sports Public Diplomacy Research Center of China,North-east Normal Lniversity,Changchun 130024,Changchun Jilin;School of Physical Education and Education Science,Nan-chang Lniversity,Nanchang Jiangxi 330031)

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学中国体育公共外交研究中心,吉林长春30024 [2]南昌大学体育与教育学院,江西南昌33003

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2018年第3期14-18,38,共6页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：2014年度国家社科基金重大项目"体育学基本理论与学科体系建构研究"(14ZDB128)

摘　　要：在"实然"与"应然"概念界定的基础上,对体育人文社会学研究过程中存在的"逻辑裂隙"进行揭示,以期引起学界的关注与思考。基于此,采用文献资料法与逻辑分析法,从体育人文社会学研究的实然出发,首先对中国体育人文社会学研究存在的"逻辑裂隙"进行了阐述,认为存在虚假繁荣、学术伪装、学术教条、建设性差、理论贫乏且与实践脱节等现象,并就其原因进行了分析;其次,指出了体育人文社会学研究的应然,包括科学的态度、思想的累积、扎实的基础、道德的自律、宽广的视野、理论联系实际、正确使用数字与方法;最后进行了小结。Based on a differentiation of the ＂ real＂ and ＂ natural＂ concept,this present paper discusses the ＂ logical rift＂ in sports sociological studies. By means of literature review and logical analysis,the paper first illustrates the logical rift in sports sociological studies,i. e. the ＂ real＂ situation,which include false prosperity,academic camouflage,academic dogmatization,weak construction,inadequacy of theories and theory ＇s disconnection with practice,and further explores the reasons behind all these problems; Then the paper points out the few areas of concern,i. e. the ＂ natural＂ tendency,which include scientific attitude,accumulation of thoughts,solid foundation,ethic self-discipline,broad horizon,putting theory into practice,appropriate use of numbers and methods. The paper concludes with a brief summary of the research findings.

关 键 词：体育人文社会学 研究 实然与应然 逻辑裂隙 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]