工程社会学学科建构路径研究  

Research on Discipline Construction Path of Engineering Sociology

作　　者：田鹏 Tian Peng(Institute of Social Innovation and Development,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 211800,China)

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学社会创新发展研究所,南京211800

出　　处：《工程研究（跨学科视野中的工程）》2018年第3期219-227,共9页JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING STUDIES

基　　金：2013年度国家社会科学基金重大项目"移民工程的跨学科研究"(13&ZD172)

摘　　要：随着我国现代化进程的进一步加快,工程社会学在我国逐渐成为一门兼具跨学科特征的"显学"。首先,基于学科内在建构路径及其演化逻辑,反思性审视工程社会学既有建构路径。认为,在研究领域形态向研究范畴形态升级过程中,"工程共同体论"、"工程系统论"和"工程评价论"三种建构路径并未形成共识。其次,工程社会属性的实践共识为迈向整合的工程社会学建构路径奠定了必要的学理基础。最后,提出工程社会学建构路径的"整合论",从问题研究形态的工程社会属性到研究领域形态的工程内部运作机制及其社会影响,再到"工程域"和"工程社区"两大基本研究范畴,最后迈向"内部工程社会学"和"外部工程社会学"有机整合的学科形态。With the further acceleration of China＇s modernization, Engineering Sociology would become increasingly an apparent discipline with interdisciplinary characteristics. First, based on the internal construction path and evolving logic of the discipline, the writer stepped back to look at the existing construction path and holds that there is no consensus on the construction path of ＂Engineering Community Theory＂, ＂Engineering System Theory＂ and ＂Engineering Evaluation Theory＂ during the upgrading process from research field to research domain. Second, the practical consensus of the society property of the engineering sets a necessary academic and theoretical basis to form an integrated construction path of Engineering Sociology. Finally, the writer proposes the integration theory of the construction path of the Engineering Sociology, analysis the society property of the engineering in the form of problem research and the internal operating mechanism and social impact of the engineering in the form of research field, then expands to the two basis research domains of the ＂Engineering Domain＂ and ＂Engineering Community＂, ultimately integrating the ＂Internal Engineering Sociology＂ and the ＂External Engineering Sociology＂.

关 键 词：工程社会学 工程域 工程社区 

分 类 号：C91[经济管理]