求解当代中国法学发展的“戴逸之问”——舒国滢教授访谈录  

Interview with professor SHU Guo-ying on the development of contemporary Chinese law,the question of DAI Yi in legal science

作　　者：舒国滢[1] SHU Guo - ying

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2018年第4期5-15,共11页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：＂戴逸之问＂是20世纪80年代由中国人民大学清史研究所戴逸教授提出的＂法学是幼稚的＂的观点,他指出了中国法学发展的方向性困惑,自此众多法学家将探讨＂中国法学向何处去＂作为重要论题以求解此问。舒国滢教授通过对＂戴逸之问＂的思考,对中国法学的发展作出了阶段性的判断：20世纪80年代,由于特定的历史原因,中国法学基本上处于＂幼稚＂的状态;20世纪90年代,随着改革开放的进一步深入和国家治理形式的精细化,专业化的法律学术开始成长,但以围绕立法论为中心的法学知识生产呈现出依附解释体制的寄生状态,虽然有部分留学归国的学者开始用新的理论和方法重新解读中国的法律制度实践,然而整个学界对＂何为法学＂这个问题并未进行严肃认真的讨论。2000年—2010年,中国的法教义学进入沉淀时期。这是因为进入新世纪,几乎所有的中国法学者都试图为中国法学寻找发展的道路和方向。而法教义学的突然流行是中国法学到了知识更新或升级的阶段,是法学知识本身发展到一定阶段的内在需求,创建真正的＂法律科学＂是中国法学未来发展的必然归宿。舒国滢教授以罗马法学为基础的欧陆私法（民法）学作为样本,得出这样的结论：法学本质上是一门教义学,而法教义学本身是一门科学,或者被（法学者们）认为是一门科学,进而回答了＂戴逸之问＂,即中国法学要想摆脱幼稚走向成熟,就必须使自身成为一门真正的科学。The question of DAI Yi was the viewpoint that jurisprudence was naive which put forward by Professor DAI Yi of the Institute of the Qing History of People＇s University of China in the 1980 s. He pointed out the directional confusion in the development of Chinese jurisprudence. Since then in order to solve this problem many scholars tend to discuss the question ＂Where shall Chinese jurisprudence go？＂.Professor SHU Guo-ying divided the development of Chinese jurisprudence into the following stages by taking DAI Yi＇s consideration： In the 1980 s,due to specific historical reasons,Chinese jurisprudence was basically in a naive state; In the 1990 s,with the further deepening of reform and opening up and the refinement of the form of state governance,professional legal scholarship began to grow,but the legal knowledge production centered on the legislative theory showed the parasitic state of the dependency interpretation system,although there were some scholars returning from abroad began to reinterpret China＇s legal system practice with new theories and methods. However,the entire academic community did not seriously discuss the issue ＂What is law？＂From 2000 to 2010,China＇s legal dogmaticism entered a period of precipitation. Because of the new century,almost all Chinese legal scholars have tried to find a way and direction for the development of Chinese law. The sudden prevalence of legal dogmatics just because the Chinese jurisprudence has reached an update or upgrade of knowledge. It is the inherent demand of legal knowledge itself to develop to a certain stage. Creating a true legal science is the inevitable destination of the future development of Chinese law. Prof. SHU Guo-ying took a conclusion with Roman law based European private law（ civil law） for reference that jurisprudence is in essence a dogmatics,and dogmatics itself is a science,or is regarded as a science by the scholars. Then it answers DAI Yi＇s question,if Chinese jurisprudence wants to become mature from naive,it must

关 键 词：戴逸之问 法教义学 法律科学 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]