民刑交叉视野下网络平台共同版权犯罪责任的认定——兼对中美快播案、索尼案等案件的比较分析  

Cognizance of the Responsibility of the Joint Copyright Crime in the Network Platform under the Cross Vision of Civil and Punishment——A Comparative Analysis of China-US QvodPlayer Case and Sony Case

作　　者：张燕龙[1] Zhang Yanlong(School of Law,Beijing Foreign Studies University,Beijing 100089)

机构地区：[1]北京外国语大学法学院,北京100089

出　　处：《情报杂志》2018年第7期121-126,共6页Journal of Intelligence

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"我国版权保护的刑事路径思考"(编号:2016QD003)研究成果之一

摘　　要：[目的/意义]网络平台的刑事责任认定不能仅局限于传统的大陆法系刑法理论,还需要从民法、英美法系中借鉴思路。[方法/过程]从我国民事侵权责任条款中可以解读出网络平台可能涉及到的共同版权犯罪的三种形式,而美国在处理索尼等案件中积累的认定规则也有启发意义。[结果/结论]要准确认定平台的共同版权犯罪责任,既要理清思路,围绕正犯逐步展开,还要准确区分内容提供与服务提供,只有这样才能处理好"快播"类案件。当然,未来还需要进一步思考诱惑侵权责任以及平台的产品责任分配等一系列问题。[Purpose/Significance] The criminal responsibility of network platform can not be limited to the traditional criminal law theory of continental law system, but also need to learn from civil law and Anglo-American legal system. [Method/Process] We can interpret the three forms of the common copyright crime which may be involved in the network platform from the civil tort liability clause of our country, and the rules of cognizance in the United States in dealing with Sony and other cases are also instructive. [Result/Conclusion] To accurately identify the joint copyright liability of the platform, it is necessary to clear up the idea, gradually start around the offender, but also to distinguish between the content provider and the service provider, it is the only way to deal with the QvodPlayer cases. Of course, in the future, we need to think more about the liability of temptation tort and the distribution of product responsibility in the platform.

关 键 词：民刑 网络平台 犯罪责任 认定方法 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]