检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈琪 龙文懋[1] CHEN Qi;LONG Wen-mao(Intellectual Property School of East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
出 处:《科技与法律》2018年第3期66-73,共8页Science Technology and Law
摘 要:作品中的虚拟角色包括文学作品、卡通作品、视听作品中的虚拟角色。由于文学作品中虚拟的角色的非直观性,关于其是否可以成为著作权法保护的独立客体争议较大。对文学作品中的虚拟角色而言,可著作权性的最关键要素就是构成单独完整的表达。本文分析了我国现行著作权法在保护虚拟角色方面存在的局限,借鉴、评析并提炼了美国版权法、德国著作权法关于虚拟角色保护的标准,提出当虚拟角色能从文学作品中剥离、被单独识别并利用,就构成了单独且完整的表达,可以成为著作权法保护的独立客体。Fictional characters of works include literary characters, cartoon characters and audio-visual characters.Due largely to non-intuitiveness of literary characters, a persistent dispute is provoked over whether they can be protected as independent objects of copyright law. As for literary characters, the key element of copyrightability is to constitute independent and integral expression. This article elaborates the limitations of China's copyright law in protecting fictional characters, compares and analyzes the protecting standards in copyright law of the United States and Germany, and puts forward that when the fictional characters can be separated from the literary works and be identified and utilized independently, they turn into independent and integral expression which is justified to be protected by copyright law
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222