检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曲岩 QU Yan(Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Fengtai Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Beijing, 100072 China)
机构地区:[1]北京市丰台中西医结合医院妇产科,北京100072
出 处:《中外医疗》2018年第12期68-69,72,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的探讨碘伏纱布湿敷联合红光照射,治疗剖宫产术后腹部切口愈合不良的疗效。方法方便选取2015年5月—2017年5月该院收治的剖宫产术后腹部切口愈合不良60例患者作为研究对象,按入院时间先后分为对照组和联合组,每组30例。对照组患者采用常规局部清创后,凡士林纱布湿敷伤口引流,联合组患者常规局部清创后,采用碘伏纱布湿敷联合红光照射治疗,对比两组切口愈合情况、愈合时间、平均住院天数及患者腹部切口疼痛程度。结果联合组切口甲级愈合率(96.7%)明显高于对照组(73.3%),均差异有统计学意义(χ~2=6.68,P<0.05)。联合组患者腹部切口疼痛程度(3.2±0.7)分低于对照组(5.1±1.4)分,平均住院天数(12.6±4.7)d,明显少于对照组(18.5±7.3)d,切口愈合时间(18.6±7.6)d,明显低于对照组(28.4±12.1),均差异有统计学意义(t=6.441、3.579、11.310,P<0.05)。结论碘伏纱布湿敷联合红光照射治疗剖宫产术后腹部切口愈合不良的临床效果较好,值得在基层医院推广应用。Objective To investigate the curative effect of iodide gauze wet application combined with red light on abdominal incision healing after cesarean section. Methods 60 cases of patients with abdominal incision after the cesarean section admitted and treated in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017 were selected as the research objects and divided into two groups according to the admission order with 30 cases in each, the control group used the petrolatum gauze for wet compress drainage, after the routine local debridement, while the combined group used the iodophor gauze wet compress combined with red light irradiation after the routine local debridement, and the incision healing, healing time, average length of stay and abdominal incision pains degree were compared between the two groups. Results The level A healing rate of incision in the combined group was obviously higher than that in the control group,(96.7% vs 73.3%), and the difference was statistically significant(χ~2=6. 68, P0.05), and the pains degree of abdominal incision in the combined group was lower than that in the control group[(3.2±0.7)points vs(5.1±1.4)points], and the average length of stay was obviously lower than that in the control group [(12.6±4.7)d vs(18.5±7.3)d], and the incision healing time was obviously lower than that in the control group[(18.3±7.6)d vs(28.4±12.1)d], and the difference was statistically significant(t= 6.441,3.579,11.310, P0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of iodophor gauze wet compress combined with red light irradiation in treatment of adverse healing of abdominal incision after the cesarean section is better, which is worth promotion and application in the primary hospitals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.146.206.0