检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:喜富裕 Xi Fuyu(Department of History and Cultural,Gansu Normal University for Nationalities,Hezao,Garnu 747000,China)
机构地区:[1]甘肃民族师范学院历史文化系,甘肃合作747000
出 处:《西藏研究》2018年第2期29-35,共7页Tibetan Studies
摘 要:宦官侯显在明代中外关系和民族史上占有很重要的地位。对于侯显"五使绝域"及是否参与郑和第二次(永乐五年)及第三次(永乐七年)下西洋问题,不同的史料存在不同的记载。《明实录》《明史》等不记,《罪惟录》《吾学编》《七修类稿》《菽园杂记》却予以记载,这是因为明末清初的史家文人在编撰明史时对《星槎胜览》《瀛涯胜览》内容引用不严谨和相互抄袭,以及后来学者对这些不同史料未进行认真地甄别和科学的分析而导致。Eunuch Houxian occupied a very important position in the history of Sino-foreign relations and national history in the Ming Dynasty. There are different records in different historical materials for Hou's five times' dispatches to remote areas and whether he participated in Zheng He's second and the third voyages in the fifth and the seventh year of Yongle period respectively. The reason why there are no records of Hou's involvement in Zhenghe's voyages in the Memoir of Ming Dynasty,and the Ming History,but in Zui Wei Lu,Wu Xue Bain,Qi Xiu Lei Gao and Shu Gargen Miscellany,is that the historians and literati of the late Ming and early Qing dynasties did not make a rigorous reference to the contents of Xing Cha Shen Lan and Yin Ai Shen Lan and plagiarized each other when compiling the Ming Dynasty,and later the scholars did not seriously identify and scientifically analyze these different historical materials.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15