检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:靳建丽[1] 赵贝贝 Jin Jianli;Zhao Beibei(School of taw,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450000,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州大学法学院
出 处:《湖北工程学院学报》2018年第4期115-119,共5页Journal of Hubei Engineering University
基 金:河南省软科学研究计划项目(142400450289)
摘 要:检察机关在公诉案件的提起上拥有一定的自由裁量权,这是公诉机关特有的权力,同时,对于司法资源的节约以及当事人人权的保障具有重要意义。但就目前来看,检察机关的不起诉决定在发挥重要作用的同时,不可避免存在被滥用的风险。为了确保公诉机关权力的有效行使,同时防止该权力被滥用,亟需对我国刑事不起诉从公转自程序、事前监督程序以及被不起诉人权利等方面进行科学合理的制约。Procuratorial organs have some discretion of their own in public prosecution cases, which is their unique power and meanwhile it is of great significance for the saving of judicial resources and the human rights' guarantee of the litigant. Nevertheless, up to now, when procuratorial organs' criminal non-prosecution plays an important role, there is inevitably the risk of abuse. In order to ensure the effective execution of public prosecution organs' power and prevent abuse of the power, there is an urgent need to scientifically and reasonably limit China' s criminal non-prosecution from the respects of procedures and the rights of litigant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229