检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司
出 处:《汽车工程师》2018年第7期44-47,共4页Automotive Engineer
摘 要:为了满足汽车的舒适性、安全性及操控性方面的要求,在车型开发前期需要评估汽车的弯扭刚度。不同试验条件下测出的刚度值差异很大,为确保数据的统一性和精确性,提出一种测试技术,通过对比2种试验方案,得到扭转方案2改善了试验过程中的侧向位移,更接近汽车的真实工况;在该方法的基础上,统计几十款A级车的弯扭刚度试验数据,总结出A级车车身刚度的评价标准,为企业研发新车型提供车身刚度的参考依据。The bending and torsional stiffness should be evaluated at the earlier stage in order to meet the requirements in comfort, safety and riding. The stiffness values measured under different test conditions are quite different. To ensure the unity and accuracy of the data, a test technology is provided. This paper proposes a test technology that compares the two test schemes. The torsion scheme 2 has improved the lateral displacement in the test and is closer to the real conditions of the vehicle. Based on this method, the bending and torsion stiffness test data are collected for A-class vehicles, obtain the evaluation criterion of body stiffness, providing the reference of body stiffness for the new model development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171